USD
41.24 UAH ▼0.28%
EUR
43.47 UAH ▼2.52%
GBP
52.24 UAH ▼2.55%
PLN
10.02 UAH ▼2.9%
CZK
1.72 UAH ▼2.62%

To select money in Russia is fair. Why cannot be deprived of this opportunity for Ukrainians

"The confiscation of the assets of Russia and its consumption to finance the revival of Ukraine is an act of justice. Opinion. The media reports that "the European Commission has come to the conclusion that, from a legal point of view, the frozen reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation cannot simply be transferred to Ukraine, but will have to return Russia after the war.

" Similar thoughts were expressed earlier at the official level in a number of countries, including in the United States. Not so long ago, I would like to remind, Switzerland actually refused the confiscation of Russian assets that are in local banks. Plato at one time called a sense of justice in that he unites society. The confiscation of the assets of Russia and its consciousness to finance the revival of Ukraine is the act of justice as well.

Trying to select this opportunity from Ukrainians - to expose our society to the risk of discord. I hope this is understood by the authorities. Including those who de facto inhibit the creation of a full-fledged international tribunal. Which, in my deep conviction, should resolve the issue of confiscation. Below is an excerpt from my material from September last year.

"We have repeatedly heard that the countries of the event are ready to transfer to Ukraine frozen reserves and other property of the Russian Federation, but it requires a legal mechanism. There is a point of view that this requires an international treaty that will include states that have property of persons involved in aggression against Ukraine, and for this purpose, states, say, should make changes to their internal legislation.

In our opinion, this path is dead All states are independent and equal, the property of the state cannot be charged with another state or a group of states without the consent of the said state. The second is the principle of forced confiscation of property solely by court decision. And the transfer of property of the aggressor and its associates to Ukraine in accordance with the international treaty will indicate a non .