Putin's video said that it was necessary to limit the exports of Ukrainian grain and food in the Black Sea. He has the same beacon that it is not for African countries, but somewhere in Europe. What Russia is quoted here, "rudely threw and inflated. " And then he will talk about it with Turkish President Erdogan. How should we react to it? - Then the question, and who inflated, who threw? Apparently, Erdogan, was a mediator with the UN.
Who signed this agreement with Russia and in parallel with Ukraine? She signed the UN and Turkey, represented by the UN Secretary General and the President of Turkey. So who inflated and who dropped, here's a question to Putin. It seems to me that this speech and the vast majority of theses expressed by Putin regarding Ukraine and the war against Ukraine are just a wonderful material for a psychologist, psychoanalyst and even a psychotherapist, when it comes to Putin himself.
There is an important context. Everything that Putin and theses that expresses are emphasized on, can be interpreted as an accentuated problem. For example, Putin says once again, you cited that the attack on Ukraine was a mirror answer. If he is constantly justified, he is looking for arguments, what was it necessary to do, what is it for? Persuade the internal audience? So everything has been said for a long time, as if according to official Russian sociology, there is no one to persuade.
Slovensku
Українська
English
USA
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Polski
Čeština
Español
