"Korean Scenario" from Putin: Why "Two Ukrainians" will not

The unacceptability of the "Korean variant" for Ukraine is the very controversy that the result of war in Ukraine can be some "Korean version", the country's section on its own "38 parallel" seems to reflect misunderstandings by participants of this discussion - even if they are such high -ranking officials , as an expression of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev is the very essence of what is happening in the Russian-Ukrainian war.

After the Second World War, the status of Korea as an independent independent state is recognized as almost all states, even those who have recently claimed and influence on the territory of this country. Times of prohibitions on Korean and culture, contempt for the Korean people and their civilization have gone into the past. It is the recognition of Korea and Koreans that is one of the important, and not very historically noticeable to us the results of World War II, a true triumph of justice.

However, the notion of what New Korea will become, allies from the anti -Hitler coalition were different. The Stalin Soviet Union - China, which was won by the Communists Mao Jzedun in the Civil War, sought in the Civil War - sought the emergence of communist Korea. And the West, first of all, the United States believed that the Korean people have the right to their own democratic state.

That is why, after capturing the Kim Il Seine Southern Country, the UN Security Council (then boycotted by the USSR, and China's place was occupied by representatives of the Chinese Republic to Taiwan), sent peacekeepers to the Korean Peninsula to counteract occupation. But at the same time, again, no one questioned the right of the Korean state to exist. The conflict of Russia and Ukraine is a sure, quite different story. Ukraine for Russia seems to be Korea not after the Second World War.

The Russian leadership denies the Ukrainian state in the right to exist, responds with contempt for the Ukrainian people and language, requires that Ukrainians use not their own language but in the language of neighboring Russia. That is, he does everything that the occupiers were made on the Korean Peninsula before the Second World War.

If the Kremlin wanted the emergence of "Second Ukraine", which was recently written in "Izvesti" by Viktor Medvedchuk (accused of treason against Ukraine and the godfather of Russian President Vladimir Putin. - Ed. ) year in Crimea. There would be nothing deprived of the post of President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych to flee to Rostov, he could form an alternative power in Simferopol. Even if not in Simferopol, it is probably in Donetsk.

Here is the "two Korea", democratic and pro -Russian, that's the new Kimol Saint. But nothing like this happened. Neither 2014 nor 2022. Each time the territories that could become a "base" for the "second Ukraine" were not just occupied but also annexed. And, sorry, it is quite logical.

Why does Putin need a "second Ukraine" if he does not believe in the existence of the first? If he is ready to violate international law to join Ukrainian Crimea, so that children in Melitopol or Berdyansk learn a foreign language and read books about another's life to deprive the whole people of his own identity.

And what is this new? Hitler was ready to agree with the decorative French "statehood" with the capital in Visha, but the Czech Republic or Poland turned into a Reich colony without the right to identity, and the Jews simply wanted to erase from the face of the earth. Volodymyr Putin also denies Ukrainians in the right to identity, and in Crimea the very essence of sovereignty associated with the rights of the Crimean Tatars. Therefore, there will be no "two Koreys".