"Learn from mistakes": the Russian army develops, gaining experience of defeat from the Armed Forces - an analyst.

"It was an organized retreat, not an escape, as we saw in Izium, with great losses and abandoned equipment. According to the analyst, the Russian military did not go unharmed, but went organized for several weeks. At the same time, the Armed Forces General Sergey Surovikin, according to the expert, was able to learn how to socialize the need for retreat before it happens.

"Putin's decision to annex the territory that the Russian forces do not control and cannot be protected, will be studied for many years as an example of what should not be done," Kafman said. He also stated that Kherson is a significant victory for Ukraine. The approach of the Ukrainian command was to find a compromise, meanwhile to force the Russians to leave the city and save the lives of their soldiers and civilians. Coffman called this approach reasonable.

In his opinion, he best characterizes the Ukrainian command. According to Senior Advisor to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Mark Kanchian Marine Corps, Russian troops in Kherson, was higher than that of Izium's troops. They were also guided by the best commanders. Newsweek writes about it.

According to Kancian, although the retreat in Kherson caused Russian President Vladimir Putin a political blow in military terms, this retreat was a reasonable choice that was realized well. Earlier, Focus reported that Belarus had transferred more than 200 units of military equipment. According to investigators, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation received tanks from Belarus, "Urals" and BMPs, which they can use in the war with Ukraine.