Russia will never stop fighting. It will only end with the death of the empire

I was 2-3 years old, I could not read yet, but I unmistakably determined this plate, even in complete darkness. He demanded it. Probably, he anticipated that in 58 years I will remember the words of the song, and at this point firmly know: the Russians want.

The whole history of Russian statehood, since pre -Petrivian times, is the history of expansion: wars, raids, strife, seizure of territories, lies, bloody "assimilations" of dozens of large and hundreds of small peoples, which in many cases can be called genocide. The problem is not that it was in the past - virtually all empires acted similar methods: Spain, Britain, Portugal in their history made the hair that hair becomes stagnant while reading historical documents.

And that there are empires, if you remember what the French, Germans, the Dutch and the Belgians created in the colonies were created in the colonies, then you can be greeted from horror. The problem is that the Russians remained at the level of the 19th - early 20th centuries, when the world has changed and lives in completely different rules, with other concepts and moral imperatives.

The modern Russian Federation with its simultaneous cosplay of the Russian Empire, the USSR and Nazi Germany is a shaggy, troglodite with a bad smell that has been in today's world, a relic, painted with shamans fossilized. spiritual scraps. It is impossible to approach the problems and challenges of today, based on the morals and methods of half -time. It is impossible to evaluate the events of half -magnifier, based on morality and methods of today.

What seems immoral and terrible in the first half of the 21st was quite normal in the early 20th century. When a hundred and forty million country becomes in time like a fly in amber, and tries to behave like a fascist state of age -old, one should not be surprised that ostracism and economic isolation awaits it. This is a normal reaction of civilization to an extremely dangerous stimulus.

I recently read a record in the blog of the famous Russian writer Lazarchuk (by the way, one of the students of Strugatsky), which explains, for me personally, if not all, much of what we have encountered in Russia over the last 20 years. The author is not Andrew himself, but some Andrew Peter, but in view of everything, Lazarchuk supports this point of view. War as the meaning of life.

The war that filled the empty shell of the existence of a generation from 40 to 60, which decays in a peaceful life. Not progress - the desire of new, discoveries, stars, mutual understanding, general well -being . . . War. Blood, shit, torn limbs, cities in fire, orphans, widows, misery, devastation. Fighting for false ideas. War for new territories with complete inability to order the territories that are. The war for the empire, which has long been decomposed and rotten in its shallow grave.

These are the meanings that should be given life? And what is the life in which death for the Kremlin's stupidity is a replacement for death from vodka and poor old age? Seriously? Is it a decent end of the generation? War for making a million hectares? Kill another hundred thousand people who want nothing from you except you are gone from the horizon forever? The wrong Russians are Ukrainians? Death for Russian, which was said by those you kill? So. It is so. This is serious.

This is not a trend of recent years, not the influence of the Putin regime. This is a really national idea. The national idea (although it sounds strange) is not a separate nationality, not the Russians, but of the imperial - regardless of the right of blood - by the right of belonging to the outlive, archaic, inhuman form of existence of civilization. To her deaf branch.

Here is what one of the most significant for the Russian (and not only Russian, to honestly) culture of writers Fyodor Dostoevsky: "We need this war and ourselves; not only for the Slavic Brothers themselves, we are exhausted by the Turks, we climb, but also for our own salvation: the war will refresh the air we breathe and in which we were panting, sitting in the light of corruption and in spiritual closeness "in 1877.

In Russia, since the fall of 1875, a massive movement of Slavic struggle support, which covered all social groups. In society, there was an acute discussion in society: progressive circles have justified the liberation goals of wars, conservatives discussed its possible political dividends, such as the capture of Constantinople and the creation of a Slavic Federation, headed by monarchical Russia.

The traditional Russian dispute between Slavophiles and Westerners was imposed on this discussion, in addition, the first, represented by the writer Dostoevsky, was seen in the war of fulfillment of a special historical mission of the Russian people, which consisted of cohesion around Russia of Slavic peoples on the basis of Orthodoxy, And others, in Turgenev, denied the religious aspect and believed that the purpose of war was not to protect Orthodoxy, but to release Bulgarians.

But we are interested in the view of the war (by the way, it is difficult to call it liberation and, if you remember the historical perspective, the released Bulgaria, which was under the atrocity as on the antidote from the "infirmity and spiritual tightness".

I deliberately start from the end of the 19th century, so that my theses do not seem particularly outdated, but if desired we can easily arrange a tour in ancient times, pre -Petrivsky, Petrovsky, Catherine… And any time - always war was considered a good thing for society and for society and for society and for society states useful. Aggression to neighbors, to competitors on the world stage, to all the surrounding, but not subject to or covered or covered by the rebellion of the world.

Xenophobia, Pan -Slavism, ideas of Orthodoxy have always been encouraged by state power. And the ideas of the Communist International fit into the Russian Mainestrim, especially if you understand the religious essence of the communist idea - the replacement of one sect by another essence of teaching does not change. The war of 1904 with Japan, according to Vyacheslav von Pleve, was planned as "a small victorious war capable of keeping the revolution.

" As the Russo-Japanese War ended, we remember the history of 1905, too. The Little Victory resorted to glory, also giving the meaning of life for hundreds of thousands of people who died on it. "Sir! - says the Minister of Russia in 1914 to Emperor Nicholas II. " War is the best thing that can happen to Russia! " Another little victorious war? The previous one was not enough? There are special peoples - peoples who do not study on their own or someone else's experience.

Emperor Nicholas the Second makes a decision, and thousands of people with burrows, flags, slogans gather in the Palace Square-they are going to die for the Serbian brothers, for Orthodoxy (which no one touched) and for the interests of the aging empire.

The king makes a speech from the balcony of the Winter Palace, the people are on their knees, the churchmen bless the new massacre - it must show the world's power of the empire, demonstrate Russia's influence on world politics and put royal cousins ​​that have become a place for them. But the plans were not destined to come true.

This "victorious" war leads to the collapse of statehood, changes in the political system and the emergence of a new monster - a communist dictatorship, as aggressive, bloody and greedy as the Russian Empire. In the Great War, millions of people die, another tens of millions of the Civil War goat . . . Russia lies in ruins. The Bolsheviks remove the remnants of the empire from the war, finally zeroing Russian plans for control of the straits and a leading role in the world hierarchy.

And if you think that this grand defeat has taught something 1/6 of the land, then you are deeply mistaken. She did not teach. We are on the grief of all the bourgeois peace of the world.

Lord, bless! More thank the millions of the troupes in the fields of the field, as the new power of the dream nicometsya! You give Warsaw! Give Berlin! We were inserted into the cut! If you did not know this yet, then I will open your eyes: the ideas and goals of the international (the first, the second, which is the third) Comintern was not the happiness and well -being of workers and peasants around the world, but exports of the revolution in the most terrible and bloody form - Russian .

It is an attempt to direct intervention in all countries of the world and an attempt to occupy them. It is in the future death and devastation, similar to the one that was arranged by Lumpen, who is crazy, under the guidance of the falling intelligentsia, in the territories of the former RI. And it was this form of inhuman dictatorship that was a logical extension of centuries -old Russian politics - the flesh of those who have built a system where slaves who sought wars were gaining new slaves.

Did you ask the question: Why did the Western countries not assist the USSR in the fight against Hitler for so long? No? So ask yourself: whose side will you take the frogs and vipers? Ask yourself why the Cold War began after the Second World War? Why did Churchill make a Fultonic speech? Is it not enough to be smart with 40 million dead? Whether Gulag won Auschwitz, marked not the victory of the good over the bad, but only a new phase of fighting evil, where the least (now) evil rose to the pedestal of great evil, and turned out to be in its place? Do Russians want war? Let us ask Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, residents of Baltic countries, Moldovan, Georgians, themselves, after all! Let's look at Africa, transformed by the Soviet Union-its money, its agent, its satellites-from the continent-resort to a nightmare continent.

By the way, it is now that he developed and removes the Gold Foam "Wagner". Let's look at South America, where the heirs of the Russian Empire poured hundreds of millions per local Livaks. On the siege and other evil.

Remember who was feeding left terrorism in Europe? Who financed and armed the Arab countries, slamming them into Israel? Who "liberated" Southeastern Asia from American influence? Who kissed with the floor in the clear? Who invaded Afghanistan and killed a million people there? So do Russians want war? What gives the real meaning of their life? Why did they laugh happily when the planes bombed the mountain, killing civilians? Why did General Swan nose nonsense about the Moldovan fascists and listened to him? Why in today's war, Putin supports from 70 to 85% of the survey? Who is guilty of this? Alexey Tishaysha? Peter? Catherine? Suvorov Is any of Alexander? Nicholas the first or the second? Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev or Brezhnev? Or maybe only Putin with Medvedev? Is it still a mentality of the diverse of the political nation that we call Russians? About the interests and desires of the deep people that inhabits a huge country in which most are unsuitable for human residence? In what war, violence, cruelty is a form of existence, not misery? What can be said about people for whom war is a life -giving process that fills at least some sense of useless existence? Where is the alternative to the *** life of life is the opportunity to pick up a stranger's life? Rob, rape, destroy, occupy, negotiate? Empires live exclusively with expansion.

When the empire ceases to capture and appropriate, it begins to die. The current Russia is a galvanized corpse of the Soviet Union that tries to return to the former borders. She has never been good and has not become bad today. It has always been so - from birth to this day. It cannot be changed, persuaded or reformed.

It is resistant to internal and external influences, because aggression is a form of its existence, and the internal disorder of the population and territories is an incentive for external expansion. Everything is harmonious. Roughly speaking, a senseless and difficult life within the country, disorder, poverty, lack of access to normal medicine, education, pushes the population for wars and related to this crime.

A war for millions of Russians is a window in the world, a tourist voucher, a journey to a foreign country, where it is best to enter a tank or APC, because otherwise it is not possible to break out of this life. Because at home, these millions "have never lived well - neglect *** and start!" In general, a closed circle, which today is only in a shallow grave in the Ukrainian forestry.

Is it better than die of vodka under a fence or at a camp on a forestry? War can be a meaning of life instead of creating only in a deadly sick society. To replace the desire to live, to create, to love the desire to fight, to kill, to carry destruction can only be deprived of the society of hope and putting in conditions where there is no alternative except death for the sake of power.

I'm afraid we are doomed to war with the Serpent Horynich, who cannot be killed, because he has millions of heads, and he cannot be persuaded not to live as he lives without rebuilding his cave for something more suitable for life. And it is impossible to rebuild it, because the cave is too large, mysterious, and the serpent itself is habitually, though mentally bad. So you cannot relax. This war cannot end tomorrow.