USD
41.44 UAH ▲0.14%
EUR
45.15 UAH ▲1.2%
GBP
53.82 UAH ▲0.19%
PLN
10.36 UAH ▲0.92%
CZK
1.78 UAH ▲1.3%
Some Western analysts suggest that the punch of drones had symbolic goals and wa...

According to the UAV attack on the Kremlin, Ukraine can stand - Financial Times

Some Western analysts suggest that the punch of drones had symbolic goals and was aimed at weakening the Kremlin's power, as well as a demonstration of Russia's vulnerability. Ukraine can stand on the Kremlin.

This opinion was expressed by some Western experts, which refers to Financial Times, according to the director of the Russian CNA Analytical Organization Program, Michael Kafman, if Ukraine organized an attack, then a blow to the Senate Palace building in the Kremlin had symbolic purposes and was aimed at weakening Russian power. And also on the demonstration of Russia's vulnerability. At the same time, experts have the opinion that Russia could staging a blow to the Kremlin.

With this version he disagreed with a high -ranking Western diplomat, who also talked to FT, but wished to stay unnamed. He stated that such a blow did not meet the Kremlin's interests, as it demonstrates the vulnerability of one of the most protected places in Russia and causes "great political harm to Vladimir Putin. " The Western military declared the newspaper that Kiev had the means of defeat of the Kremlin.

"Ukraine has shown that it can take a commercial product from the shelf, scalable it and then use it creatively for lethal purposes. And previous attacks of Ukraine with the help of unmanned devices showed how difficult it is to defend itself from such blows," - said the Western diplomat on the conditions of anonymity. In Roszmi, the drones that attacked the Kremlin were launched from the Moscow region manually and could use prohibited frequencies. This is evidenced by their size and charge.

"They had no charge, something was made of pyrotechnics. It was not a mine, it was not a ammunition that could cause any harm. This is what could be boiled from handy funds in Russia," said The Insider CEO "Aircraft", developer of unmanned aerial vehicles Sergey Truskach.

In his opinion, the UAV was missed, because it either stood a Starlin Retranstor, which uses quite non-standard frequencies, so it is extremely difficult to suppress it, or a repeater from any Internet to a non-standard frequency was used. The drone operator could be anywhere. Recall that analysts of the American Institute for War Study (ISW) believe that Russia will use the drone attack on the Kremlin to abolish the events before May 9 to represent a war in Ukraine as a threat to Russia.