USD
41.8 UAH ▲0.04%
EUR
49.03 UAH ▲0.09%
GBP
56.92 UAH ▼0.62%
PLN
11.54 UAH ▼0.05%
CZK
1.99 UAH ▲0.59%
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin is sick and physically, declared in Ukrainian in...

"False man". As Putin became a dictator and who can influence his behavior - explains the psychologist. Interview

Russian dictator Vladimir Putin is sick and physically, declared in Ukrainian intelligence. Also, they said, he has signs of schizophrenia. In an interview with Radio NV, Valentine Kim, psychologist and non -verbal communication expert testify to the actions and words of the dictator. - The report of Ukrainian intelligence that Putin, it turns out, is also schizophrenic. It was clear for many of us a long time.

Perhaps not so clinically, but rather, judging by the actions he commits, in the delusions that he does not exist, he imagines himself with the second Peter I, and maybe Stalin at the same time. How far did this sore go to this mental, and how much does it affect his actions? Video day - in fact there is a huge number of schizophrenia, its types and types. And diagnose schizophrenia have specialists psychiatrists. It will be difficult for us to do it.

Therefore, when we say that Putin turns out that there is schizophrenia, we have to understand that it is more about our hopes, that we are dealing with a completely wrong person. Therefore, I advise [Ukrainians] not to treat this as a really clinical diagnosis, but as such a collective enemy with whom we are dealing with. The fact that Putin's behavior is wrong is really the case. And we see it and observe our own experience.

The fact that he makes the wrong decision that he was wrong in the evaluation of Ukraine is that he was mistaken in the assessment of his military and patriotic potential is quite obvious things. But does this mean that he is a schizophrenia? I can't say unfortunately. - A person with clearly some psychological deviations has absolute power.

Any FSB doctors can stabilize it if they need it? Do you hide a nuclear suitcase with a button? Is it treated? Will it stabilize? - We are dealing with a rather problematic, difficult situation. In the history of the Kremlin, there have already been cases where doctors have recruited no power over the dictator. For example, this was the case in Anna John, when her doctor was a second person in the state. This was the case during the Elizabeth Elizabeth Queen.

And already in Stalin's time, you remember, it was a matter when doctors were accused of developing Stalin, destroying the world of modern (at that time) Soviet medical science. I think the Kremlin towers will not allow any political force that will influence the leader. Doctors in this case, if they are influenced, will follow instructions. And here is the more question of who is entitled to give instructions to such doctors. And to expect initiatives in this sense is not necessary.

But can they really hide from Putin a nuclear suitcase or remove any levers of influence on the situation? Yes, it is really possible because the structure of the Russian power is maintained not only on centralization, but also on division. That is, Putin centralizes a huge number of power functions, but he also divides them, because one person is still unable to control anything. It is able to control all areas of political, economic, any other activity that power should be engaged in.

Therefore, enormous powers are concentrated in the middle level of the Kremlin authorities. And so she can play her own games, can control Putin because of what information she will give him and what he will perceive for reality. This is an important question. - Are he designed a reality? He does not use the Internet, he is brought to him by some of these fads with reports.

And what is written in those reports, we can not know literally, but we understand that for him he is designed his reality, and he is already living in this reality. Can it be so that, for example, Putin, who believes that he has a huge historical mission that he is "sobiratel of land", the voices of some Stalin or Peter and seem to him, "Vova, you still need to do the Donbas. " Something can be at all? - It can be theoretically.

You see, a person has been in power, he is constantly in his own information bubble. For example, the folders bring him because he does not use the Internet. I heard about that. But I will not be surprised if he even uses the Internet, but it is for him that all these botthars have created their own [space]. We can imagine that Vladimir Putin opens Facebook, registers, enters the Virtual Kremlin Facebook, where all will support it, where the news will be artificially created.

For dictators, this is often done in order to continue to exist in this information vacuum, in the territory of the news that they present in the same folds. About the votes he can hear. A person in power feels a great pressure of responsibility. And Vladimir Putin is no exception. He has been entrusted with a huge country, he is a person quite accidental in power. That is, we are not seeing charismatics, who gradually approached power step by step, but the person who was appointed.

And the person who was adapting, and now he is in [state] acquired messianism. He did not come to power with these ideas. They emerged already when he began to use the authorities to the full coil, so to speak. That is why such people often have a tendency to seek some meaning, some historical conditionality of their own residence. They can listen to psychics, to Messian ideas, to anything. These people often demonstrate dependence on random ideas.

And so I do not exclude the presence of such voices that can be induced by him. - Putin, I noticed it in his articles and statements, constantly viewed ideas of humiliation and revenge. That is, Russia, which is "killed.

" This means that Putin himself was probably despised, humiliated as a child, and he now wants to take revenge on his childhood, all over the world? Disadvantage, humiliation, revenge, humiliation of someone else in his behavior exist to play? - Yes, the efforts to overcome the roles that have been inherent in him. There is a large number of efforts to conduct such research and identify some factors that influenced Vladimir Putin.

Very often they say that Vladimir Putin seems to be such a yard of the Podvromen, who is arrogant, sharp, prone to unexpected moves. In fact, such guys are unlikely to work for the KGB. Most likely, Vladimir Putin, as often as researchers insisted on it, was a child closed, was a mother's son, was a child who was raised in a family where there was a despotic father whose love had to be earned.

And so Vladimir Putin grew up a child very comfortable, very focused on power, very focused on the first persons who should be this external adult, who can be hidden. That is, Vladimir Putin did not demonstrate leadership qualities. And 20 years ago, when he was appointed to be the president of the country (and his appointment was the result of the agreement of the Russian elites, it is already known enough for almost everyone) Vladimir Putin really began to try to overcome this role.

- That is, he did not conquer power, did not do something because he received power, and understands, probably, does he feel that he was not the subject of such a decision? - The Russian authorities made vaccinations in the form of Vladimir Putin, as vaccinations make some plants. They are vaccinated with a branch to some birch or apple. Made such vaccination to the Russian authorities.

And now a person who has children's complexes, uncertainty, who has been wearing suitcases all his life, should behave as a leader. Where does he get a role model? He begins to copy it. He begins to remember how other leaders behaved. It is from here that his secrecy comes; It is from here that he is not a public person, not a charismatist, that he often hesitates, shows indecision. This in some sense does not satisfy the interests of the Kremlin itself.

And so the behavior of Vladimir Putin is an attempt to overcome the role that Russian authorities impose on him, the structure of Russian power. There were many leaders in the history of Russia who did not have leadership skills who were assigned to the post or by the right of birth, or simply as a result of an agreement of certain elites. And such people then became dictators. It is because the Russian structure of power requires a dictatorial management style. It is based on centralization.