Avory doubts: in Britain with irony responded to the statements of the Russian Federation about "intercept" Storm Shadow

British analyst Sean Bell pointed to previous cases where the Russian side made false statements about the possibilities of its air defense. For this reason, the Kremlin cannot be trusted completely. Sky News Analytist, Sean Belle, responded to Russia's statements about allegedly intercepted Storm Shadow missiles, urging to keep caution in such statements. He pointed out in previous cases where the Russian side made false statements about the possibilities of its air defense.

The TV channel notes that in the last 24 hours Russian propagandists have written about at least two knocked -shadow shadow. "When Russia declares it, we can never be sure whether it is true," Belle said. The analyst added that these shells are very difficult to intercept, though it did not rule out it. Belle noted that Russia's doubts also raise statements about the "destruction" of HIMARS systems, based on the assumption that it may be part of the information operation.

In this regard, he also mentioned the successful use of the Patriot system in Ukraine, which resulted in the shot of the Dagger missile complex. According to the analyst, such actions did not like the President of Putin. "The reality is that we do not really know the truth about it, but one key we know is that the West supplies a reasonable weapon to Ukraine, which gives an asymmetrical advantage," he added.

Recall that the Minister of Defense of the UK Ben Wallace on May 18 confirmed the successful use of Storm Shadow by the Ukrainian military long -range missiles. Storm Shadow's winged rockets were known to Ukraine on May 11. The ammunition had to expand the potential of the Armed Forces on the eve of the expected counter -offensive. Moscow was threatened with measures in response to the front from the Russian invaders, but did not specify what weapons would be opposed to British rockets.