It does not matter whose missiles have fallen in Poland. NATO and US will continue to support Ukraine
Ukrainian air defense worked, some of the shells were shot. This massive rocket firing of critical infrastructure has become a record. Unfortunately, the explosions were heard on the territory of neighboring Poland that day. A rocket dropped on the border with Ukraine on the Pshevodov. Two people were killed. Suppose a blow is caused by Russia. Most likely, he was accidental. I think if the Russians wanted to attack the NATO country, they would hardly choose a small Polish village.
It does not look like a logical act for a person like Putin. It is also likely that a rocket was released by Ukrainian air defense. Therefore, the careful NATO reaction and the lack of sharp statements are the right strategy. An investigation into an incident is being investigated, which involves both international specialists and representatives of Ukraine. But now it is clear: it doesn't matter whose rocket is.
Still, Russia is responsible for the destruction in Pshevodov, which led to the death of two Poles. Even if the cause of the explosion is Ukrainian air defense, Ukraine cannot go about the guilt, and in the West it is well understood. Only Russia is responsible for what happened in Poland. No one tells the Ukrainians: "Defend more accurately. " No one awaits the words from Ukraine: "We will not protect our sky, fearing that our air defense can fall somewhere abroad.
" The Armed Forces should and will fight for their citizens in every possible way - this is not discussed. Pshevod's events have shown that the war in Ukraine is becoming more dangerous for the whole world. Russian weapons are not so modern and innovative that it is always the purpose. The Kremlin sends 100 missiles a day. Obviously, the longer the war will last, the more likely the Russians will fall in Poland or Romania.
There will be no insurmountable obstacles before the Russian rocket unless the Western countries give Ukrainians the most modern air defense systems. The Kremlin will not be able to respond to the Kremlin in NATO territory. And what everyone is so afraid of, we will deal with a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO. It is clear that the thought widespread among the Western politicum "we will not give Ukraine heavy weapons, so as not to provoke escalation" is deeply erroneous.
On the contrary, if you do not give Ukrainians more precision and modern weapons or delay with its supply, the risk of escalation is increasing every day. In the context of what happens, I often mention Sir Winston Churchill: "You can always count on the Americans do the right thing after they have tried everything else" have a trried everything else). I think that, after all, Ukraine will receive both the latest air defense and new level drones.
We will help, but we will traditionally do it with great delay. The way it happened to Himars, which the United States still handed over to the Ukrainians, despite all the fears. If America made this decision two months earlier, how many people could she save? The course of the war would be completely different. Fortunately, today, when communicating with representatives of the American establishment, I see positive changes about the timing and volume of military assistance of Ukraine.
So far, Baiden's administration is opposed to the transfer of Grey Eagle reconnaissance and UAV. But this is not a former categorical refusal. Now we hear the fears that if Russia is gathering one of them, it will be able to steal this innovative technology. Therefore, America is trying to change these drones in such a way as to reduce this risk. Logically thinking, we understand what this is done to convey Grey Eagle to Ukraine.
Until recently, the restrained Germany gave its most modern air defense Ukraine, not its own army. Russia has no symmetrical response to the western technologies of today. 18 Himars, which I mentioned above, completely changed the situation in the theater of combat. After all, this development has been 20-30 years. But there is nothing to answer on Himars in Russia. At the same time, at any military initiative, Putin has a worthy argument.
Even if Putin applies nuclear weapons, we will not raise our hands with the words "Take away Ukraine. " Biden said that if Russia decides to use nuclear weapons, the US reaction will be catastrophic for the Kremlin. Suppose that the Russian Black Sea flotilla can cease to exist, for example. Moreover, this response of the event does not mean the use of NATO nuclear arsenal. We have to oppose the Kremlin without even resorting to nuclear strokes.
Of course, after such events, the world will become even more dangerous. I hope that the Russians understand - the answer to the use of nuclear weapons will be rigid and immediate. Russia's actions are typical of a terrorist state. However, history proves that in free countries, terrorist methods do not work. Israel still exists and thrives despite the constant terrorist attacks.
The reaction of America to the events of September 11 was a demonstration of strength, not the manifestation of weakness or desire to negotiate with terrorists. And I know that people in Ukraine will not seem to Russian terror either. The Kremlin also hopes to weaken the spirit of the Western world. I want to declare as a representative of Western society - no, Russian terror will not break us.