"Forecasting of war scenarios". What they wanted to say in the joint article of Zaluzhny and Zabrodsky Ukrainians, West and Russia. Interview with Rahmanin

Valery Zaluzhny and Mikhail Zabrodsky (Photo: Collage HB / www. zsu. gov. ua / Petro Poroshenko / Facebook) Commander -in -Chief Valery Zaluzhny and First Deputy Chairman With Russia, called the prospects for providing a military campaign 2023: Ukrainian view. The two generals, as well as to whom, in an interview with Radio NV, were explained by Serhiy Rakhmanin, a member of the Vots, a member of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence in an interview with this text.

Video of the day - that Zaluzhnaya and Zabrodsky has published a plan of action in public, increasing its impact on our partners, which should understand the need to significantly strengthen Ukraine and military assistance? - I would somewhat adjust the question: will it affect not only our Western partners, but on our society? Not only our foreign partners, but also Ukrainian citizens should be readers of this text.

Two experienced generals, two people who know very well what they write about, say, finally named things by their names. I do not compare my humble person with the experience of Zaluzhny or Zabrodsky, but this is what I said: we have inflated expectations, hatkotas, which, unfortunately, are present not only in telegrams, but also in television. They create a somewhat cheated idea of ​​how this war continues and when it is over.

[In the material of the generals] there is a completely logical emotional, without hysterics, but without unnecessary pathos of giving facts and forecasting scenarios of war, depending on what the assistance will be for Ukraine first. As for our Western partners.

I think they are mostly informed about what we need, because none of the positions that Valery Fedorovich and Mikhail Vitaliyovich are emphasized for any premiere, president or defense minister of any of those countries that They provide us with help.

I think that from now on, when these theses, suggestions have acquired loud resonance, our politicians, diplomats, who constantly emphasize that Ukraine needs a long-range artillery, modern operational-tactical missile systems, modern aviation, ammunition in quant It would create a parity with the Russian Federation, there will be an opportunity to emphasize these requirements much more.

Even if someone comes to say that we reveal plans before the enemy, I think that the enemy is well informed about the state of things in our defense forces, because he also has intelligence. He is well aware that our successes are not tactical and not operational, but strategic - depend on how fast, efficient and mass help in weapons and weapons will be.

- It seems to me that one of the central theses of the article is that until the Crimea remains under the occupation, even you should not dream of ending the war. There may be both a political and military component to make our partners at different levels, trying to look for some mechanisms of stopping this war, they did not even offer the option of losing the occupied territories.